FFIM

FFIM is a non-profit organization devoted to promoting and preserving Maine's fisheries
It is currently November 18th, 2017, 4:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: March 16th, 2010, 11:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: December 27th, 2001, 1:00 am
Posts: 2714
Location: Portland
Image

Q: What is Maine's management philosophy for Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus?

A: The management of charr in Maine is guided by goals and objectives formulated and developed by a periodic planning process. The latest revision of the Arctic charr plan and the species assessment was in 2001. Some of the guiding principles of the plan are 1) use of conservative fishery regulations, 2) habitat quality protection, and 3) conservation of the unique gene pool present in Maine.

Maine’s management philosophy is a conservative one toward the species, that is, maintaining and conserving each current population is a high priority. Sport fishery regulations that adequately protect the species from overharvest, excessive hooking mortality, and the accidental or unauthorized introductions of new fish species, those that are invasive to the charr water, are in place on all waters in Maine. The plan identified that invasive species remain a serious threat for populations in Maine. While cumulative impacts of watershed uses is a concern for habitat, no issue currently takes higher precedence than the spread of invasive species and their direct effects on charr population viability.

Arctic charr in Maine represent a very rare and unique resource represented by the only populations in the lower forty-eight States. Furthermore, recent genetic work shows that our populations are genetically isolated, representing unique gene pools, and that many of them have adapted specifically to the available forage base. For these reasons, we have adopted a management plan that warrants protection for each individual population because compromising or losing even one would mean an irretrievable loss of the genetic makeup for the species in Maine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 18th, 2010, 7:13 am 
Offline
FFIMer

Joined: June 24th, 2005, 12:00 am
Posts: 444
Quote:
While cumulative impacts of watershed uses is a concern for habitat, no issue currently takes higher precedence than the spread of invasive species and their direct effects on charr population viability.


If that statement is expected to be believed by the public…then it’s completely absurd that if a fisherman is ticketed with throwing a candy wrapper out of a boat (littering), on a no live bait Arctic charr pond, the fine is higher than fishing with live smelt as bait. What a low threshold for "higher precedence".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 20th, 2010, 8:05 am 
What of the Department's on actions introducing Competing Species like Lake Trout (Green) and Hatchery Brook Trout (Bald Mtn. Pond) over presumably unique Charr?

While we have a challenge stopping and catching the bloke who throws smelts
in Wadleigh or Big Reed..the Dept. can stop stocking over Charr tomorrow.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 25th, 2010, 10:07 pm 
Offline
FFIMer

Joined: July 1st, 2003, 12:00 am
Posts: 657
Just the other day ...I looked up the last two years stocking list and found No brook trout stocked into Bald mountain pond , the last stocking I think was 2007 coincedence ....who knows


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group